Volume 7, Issue 4 (12-2025)                   sjmshm 2025, 7(4): 1-9 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Saberi M K, Esmaeelzadeh M, Hashempour L, Ahmadimoghadam D, Heshmati B, Fattahi A. A bibliometric analysis and visualization of the DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. sjmshm 2025; 7 (4) :1-9
URL: http://sjmshm.srpub.org/article-3-245-en.html
1- Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Shirvan Faculty of Nursing, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Shirvan Faculty of Nursing, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran
3- Department of Information Management, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
4- Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , d.ahmadimoghadam@umsha.ac.ir
5- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
6- Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Abstract:   (214 Views)
 A Bibliometric analysis is one of the main methods to evaluate scientific journal performance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the status of bibliometric variables and mapping in DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences as one of the best scientific journals in Iran. Bibliometric analyses and mapping was performed in a total of 850 published documents between 2000 and 2018 in the DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. The data come from the Scopus databases. Bibliometric analyses were done with Microsoft Excel, and journal mapping was done with VOS viewer using bibliographic coupling, co-citation, co-authorship and co-occurrence methods.The annual citation structure of the journal shows that 90% of published documents in this period are cited at least once. The published documents in 2012 and 2013 with more than 1000 citations were the most influential documents. The document entitled ‘‘Analysis of the essential oils of two cultivated basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) from Iran’’ by Sajjadi was the highly cited document with 115 citations. In totally, there were 7846 sources that cite the journal publications. Iran, India, and the United States were the three top countries published documents in the journal from 2000 to 2018. Tehran University of Medical Sciences (421), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (83 documents), and Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (75) were the most productive institutes. Also, Abdollahi (63), Shafiee (37), Dinarvand (25) and Larijani (25) with the most publications were the most influential authors. The publications and citations of DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences have a tendency of a progressive increase. This journal has played an important role in publications and advancements of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
 
Full-Text [PDF 640 kb]   (83 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Health Informatics
Received: 2025/08/21 | Revised: 2025/10/28 | Accepted: 2025/11/15 | Published: 2025/12/25

References
1. Moed HF. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis. 2009;57(1):13. [DOI:10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5] [PMID]
2. Claude R, Charles-Daniel A, Jean A, Jean-Francois G. Bibliometric overview of the utilization of artificial neural networks in medicine and biology. Scientometrics. 2004;59(1):117-30. [DOI:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000013302.59845.34]
3. Corrales IE, Reyes JJ, Fornaris Y. Bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Oral Research: Period 2012-2015. Journal of Oral Research. 2016;5(5):188-93. [DOI:10.17126/joralres.2016.042]
4. Noyons EC, Moed HF, Luwel M. Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American society for Information Science. 1999;50(2):115-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:2<115::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-J [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:23.0.CO;2-J]
5. Nasir S, Ahmed J, Asrar M, Gilani AH. A bibliometric analysis of pharmacy/pharmacology research in Pakistan. International Journal of Pharmacology. 2015;11(7):766-72. [DOI:10.3923/ijp.2015.766.772]
6. Gorraiz J, Schloegl C. A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science. Journal of Information Science. 2008;34(5):715-25. [DOI:10.1177/0165551507086991]
7. Scahill SL, Akhlaq M, Garg S. A bibliometric review of pharmacy education literature in the context of low-to middle-income countries. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 2013;5(3):218-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2013.01.001]
8. Sweileh WM, Zyoud SE, Sawalha AF, Al-Jabi SW. A Bibliometric Study of Community Pharmacy-Based Research Activity in Middle Eastern Arab Countries: 2003-2012. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2014;13(9):1549-54. [DOI:10.4314/tjpr.v13i9.24]
9. Ding ZQ, Ge JP, Wu XM, Zheng XN. Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries. Scientometrics. 2013;96(3):829-44. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-013-0968-x]
10. Sweileh WM, Al‐Jabi SW, Zyoud SE, Sawalha AF. Bibliometric analysis of literature in pharmacy education: 2000-2016. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2018. [DOI:10.1111/ijpp.12429] [PMID]
11. López JJ, Orozco JG, Vargas‐Peláez CM. Pharmacist care activities: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research. 2018;48(2):176-82. [DOI:10.1002/jppr.1408]
12. Zhang W, Zhao Q, Deng J, Hu Y, Wang Y, Ouyang D. Big data analysis of global advances in pharmaceutics and drug delivery 1980-2014. Drug discovery today. 2017;22(8):1201-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.drudis.2017.05.012] [PMID]
13. Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. Jama. 1987;257(1):52-9. [DOI:10.1001/jama.1987.03390010056028] [PMID]
14. Abdollahi M. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences; The 2012 report of Editor-in-Chief. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2012;20:1. [DOI:10.1186/1560-8115-20-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Van Eck NJ,Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010;84:523-538. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Martyn J. Bibliographic coupling. J Doc 1964;20:236. [DOI:10.1108/eb026352]
17. Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inform Sci 1973;24:265-269. [DOI:10.1002/asi.4630240406]
18. Baltussen A, Kindler CH. Citation classics in critical care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 0(5):902-910. [DOI:10.1007/s00134-004-2195-7] [PMID]
19. Anseel F, Duyck W, De Baene W, Brysbaert M. Journal impact factors and self-citations: implications for psychology journals. Am Psychol. 2004;59(1):49-51. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.49] [PMID]
20. Holzer LA, Holzer G. The 50 highest cited papers in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(9):1878. [DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.017] [PMID]
21. Nason GJ, Tareen F, Mortell A (2013) The top 100 cited articles in urology: an update. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7(1-2):E16-E24. [DOI:10.5489/cuaj.189]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.